Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:05

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
BYD unleashes an EV industry reckoning that alarms Beijing - Fortune
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What styling mistake needs to be stopped in K-pop?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Finally a silent Snapdragon 2-in-1 - Microsoft Surface Pro 12 review - Notebookcheck
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
It turns out weather on other planets is a lot like on Earth - The Washington Post
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What are some of the best relationship advice for men?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How can a small local business with no marketing budget use social media to attract more customers?